Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Gap Sex Caboose Breaking
I'm in the middle of a mind-melting project, so no time for a coherent blog post. Instead, I'll vaguely fulminate against Jessee Jackson, Gap sex caboose breaking, and sexism. If you want a coherent application of PNM Theory to domestic politics, read Chirol. If you want a good summary of the Lacrosse incident, read . Else, read on.
Rev. Jesse Jackson, Founder and President Rainbow/Push Coalition, has announced his organization will pay the Duke scandal accuser's tuition regardless of whether she's telling the truth or not about being raped.
Too bad Elisabet Sunde wasn't black. Then she would at least have
help paying for her lawyer.
Of course, if Elisabet Sunde was black, her name might have been Crystal Gale Mangum.
16:45 Posted in Women | Permalink | Comments (3) | Email this | Tags: duke, nifong, race, racism, sex
Thursday, July 14, 2005
Jesusism-Paulism, Part III: Every Man a Panzer, Every Woman a Soldat
Something is strange in the heart of Christianity
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
Paul (Galatians 3:28)
"I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent."
Paul (1 Timothy 2:12)
If we wanted an easy answer, we would say Paul (or "The Bible") is contracting himself. Or that two different people wrote it. Or that it was just meaningless rhetoric. But Paul is followi Jesus's pattern. In spite of reaching out to women far more than others around him, Jesus notably did not choose a single woman as a disciple. His inner-circle was a diverse lot -- a tax collector, a Zealot, various fishermen, even a non-Galilean (Judas Iscariot) -- but not one woman. What is going on?
13:20 Posted in Doctrine, Faith, History | Permalink | Comments (8) | Email this | Tags: christianity, rome, 4gw, history, sex, sexes, feminism
Monday, February 21, 2005
Feminists Against Sex[es|ism]
"Women's Law Journal changes name," by
Naomi Schoenbaum and Katie Wiik, The Record, http://www.hlrecord.org/news/2005/02/17/News/Letter.To.The.Editor.Womens.Law.Journal.Changes.Name-869065.shtml, 17 February 2005 (from The Volokh Conspiracy).
This is a landmark year for our Journal. After publishing for twenty-seven years as the Harvard Women's Law Journal, we have now become the Harvard Journal of Law & Gender. Our new name does not signal a change in our Journal's content. Rather, it reflects our long-standing commitment to publishing diverse feminist scholarship that approaches gender as an axis of power within law and throughout society.
Choosing the Harvard Journal of Law & Gender as our new name indicates our unwillingness to rely upon essentialist arguments based on biological sex or to demarcate any set of issues within the legal terrain as exclusive to women. At the same time, problems that disproportionately affect women are gendered issues, and as such, they will continue to be the central focus of our Journal. Our new name also more broadly encompasses our concerns with other mechanisms of power -- such as race, class, and sexuality -- that intersect with gender in rich and complicated ways.
Ah... academia... where I shall soon be returning...
03:45 Posted in Academia, Women | Permalink | Comments (2) | Email this | Tags: feminism, gender feminism, sex, gender

