« From Palestine to Iraq | HomePage | Life after Systems Administration »

Thursday, August 23, 20071187882677

Not rogue. Just not enough.

Enterra has at least three great bloggers on their payroll: Barnett, Deichman, and of course CEO Stephen DeAngelis, writing at Enterprise Resilience Management Blog. ERMB's latest post, on China in Africa, contains this paragraph:

African countries will not experience sustainable economic growth by relying on the export of natural resources. One of the reasons that Tom Barnett and I came up with the idea for Development-in-a-Box™ was to break this cycle of reliance and help countries develop the diverse economic base and create the jobs they need to prosper. Until China understands which of their programs are helpful and which are harmful, their ventures in Africa will continue to bear the rogue label.


The reason that things are labeled in political discourse is, of course, political. China is a pro-business capitalist state, and it is no surprise that she draws attacks from anti-business and anti-capitalist groups. It's chic at best and harmless at worst to have a quirky ideology that ruins your productivity and kills millions of your citizens. But become productive and compete? That makes you rogue.

tdaxps_new_map_md
Africa is not so far away (from China)


That said, if we wish to criticize Beijing for not doing enough, we surely can. Perhaps the greatest technologies in the history of man are the police and ecological homogenization. The benefits of police are clear: a drastic reduction in violence and associated reputation-/pride-/face-/honor- related killings. Ecological homogenization, the reduction in diversity in a climate region, reduces the pathogenic load on a population, increasing average intelligence as the body has to spend less effort resisting diseases during development

If we really wanted China to help in Africa, we would encourage Chinese police to patrol African cities and Chinese industry to engage in continental climate change.

Of course, that would be labeled "rogue," too.

Comments

"Of course, that would be labeled "rogue," too."

Or "Imperialist" as any state encouraging global connectivity will likely be labeled.

"It's chic at best and harmless at worst to have a quirky ideology that ruins your productivity and kills millions of your citizens. But become productive and compete? That makes you rogue."

Lol! Well said.

Posted by: Jay@Soob | Thursday, August 23, 2007

The same people who will be celebrating al Qaeda within a generation [1] will forgive any bad regime as long at is adds "another voice" to the global.

These people are dangerous. That they are empowered by the university system is the gravest indictment against academia.

[1] http://tdaxp.blogspirit.com/archive/2007/07/05/the-importance-of-5gw.html

Posted by: Dan tdaxp | Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Post a comment