Thursday, May 31, 2007
John Kerry and/or Bob Shrum slam John Edwards
Shrum, R. 2007. Kerry's regrets about John Edwards. Time. May 30, 2007. Available online: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1626498-2,00.html.
I can't imagine a more personal attack than this:
Kerry talked with several potential picks, including Gephardt and Edwards. He was comfortable after his conversations with Gephardt, but even queasier about Edwards after they met. Edwards had told Kerry he was going to share a story with him that he'd never told anyone else—that after his son Wade had been killed, he climbed onto the slab at the funeral home, laid there and hugged his body, and promised that he'd do all he could to make life better for people, to live up to Wade's ideals of service. Kerry was stunned, not moved, because, as he told me later, Edwards had recounted the same exact story to him, almost in the exact same words, a year or two before—and with the same preface, that he'd never shared the memory with anyone else. Kerry said he found it chilling, and he decided he couldn't pick Edwards unless he met with him again. When they did, Kerry tried to get a better personal feel for his potential number two; as rivals for national office since 2000, shortly after Edwards had entered the Senate, the two men hadn't spent a lot of time together. Kerry also wanted a specific reassurance. He asked Edwards for a commitment that if he was chosen and the ticket lost, Edwards wouldn't run against him in 2008. Edwards agreed "absolutely," as Kerry recalled him saying. If Kerry had shared this at the time, I would have told him what I did later: it was naive to think he could rely on a promise like that. Unlike Joe Lieberman, who'd been plucked from relative obscurity by Gore, Edwards had made his own mark in the primaries. He was ambitious—and if he saw his chance the next time, he was likely to go for it.
Depending on who is lying, either John Kerry, John Edwards, or Bob Shrum seems to be one of the worst human beings in the world.
probably all of them, probably the two Johns, and i don't doubt it about JE. national politics produces nationally compromised candidates. ugh
Posted by: Sean | Thursday, May 31, 2007
One would think that the mere fact of having minor children (like Edwards, Obama, and I think McCain) would dissuade anyone from running. But instead we get these people.
Posted by: Steve French | Friday, June 01, 2007
On the subject of John Edwards, another trial lawyer  (high-cortisol, strongheaded personality) made the news recently...
Posted by: Dan tdaxp | Friday, June 01, 2007
I don't know about Kerry; what would his motivation have been for lying about one of his potential running mates to one of his advisors, and one with a long standing connection to Edwards at that? And (in this excerpt, at least) Shrum doesn't try to establish a pattern with Kerry.
The other two sets of motivators are easy to see, though. Edwards wants to become President, 'nuff said. Shrum all but admits to being a hack, so helping to bring down Edwards would definitely be a good thing for him if he's working for another campaign, or angling for a general campaign slot.
Posted by: Michael | Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Hurting Edwards doesn't seem to help Clinton over Obama or the reverse -- taking down a second-rung candidate only hurts that candidate.
If this story really is from Kerry, then what causes this resentment and animosity?
Posted by: Dan tdaxp | Wednesday, June 06, 2007