« Department of Homeland Security Bitchslaps Sony Records | HomePage | Hypocritical Liberal Puritans »
Monday, December 05, 20051133810100
Hypocritical Liberal Puritans
"Arnold's 'Harriet Miers Moment': Has Gov. Schwarzenegger jumped the shark?," by John Fund, Opinion Journal, 5 December 2005, http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110007637 (from The Corner).
One of the reasons I am a registered Republican is the big-government morality of the Democrat Party. This ranges from the perhaps wise, like Hillary Clinton's protection for religions in the work force, to the questionable, such as Cherry Cayabyab's sexual dinner plate regulations,
to the dumb, like Charles Schumer's attack on video games, to the idiotic:
One of the victims of that ruthlessness was Bruce Herschensohn, who in 1992 was the GOP candidate for U.S. senator against Barbara Boxer. Four days before the election, the Field Poll showed Mr. Herschensohn only one point behind. But that day Bob Mulholland, Ms. Kennedy's political director, confronted Mr. Herschensohn by parading down the aisle at a campaign appearance holding a giant poster of a strip club and shouting, "Should the voters of California elect someone who frequently travels the strip joints of Hollywood?" Reporters seized on the story. Mr. Herschensohn admitted he and his girlfriend had gone to a strip club once with another couple. Enough social conservatives stayed home to give Ms. Boxer a five-point victory.
And who was the mastermind of this puritan scheme?
Socially-liberal Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's new Chief of Staff, socially-liberal Democrat Susan Kennedy.
I guess she doesn't like bar girls either.
13:15 Posted by Dan tdaxp in Democrats, Women | Permalink | Comments (5) | Email this | Tags: puritanism
Comments
TDAXP, when I'm on my home computer I'll send you a similar picture like that, uncensored...
Only it's a man! BWAhahahahaha!!
Posted by: Curzon | Monday, December 05, 2005
"Marquess" George Curzon,
if it takes a coup,
I shall strike you down
like the Mahsudis tried to do
Posted by: Dan tdaxp | Monday, December 05, 2005
I'm afraid that doesn't conform to any haiku standards, but you're welcome to try again.
As for a coup, well... ever wonder why it's SOUTH and NORTH Dakota, as opposed to a monolithic Dakota?
Posted by: Lord George N. CURZON | Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Stupid links that won't imbed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1905_Partition_of_Bengal
Posted by: Lord George N. CURZON | Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Lord George N Curzon,
Bringer of the Anarchy:
"May the Stars be Right!"
How's that for a haiku?
(An excellent combination of Victornian England and the Cthulhu Mythos is "A Study in Scarlett," an award-winning science fiction story by Niel Gaiman http://www.neilgaiman.com/exclusive/StudyinEmerald.asp ).
The best part abuot Curzon's partition of Bengal is how it established steady and defensible borders for both India and Pakistan... Much like the Curzon line in Poland, it made everyone happy ;)
The real Curzon might appreciate the reason Dakota was split as it was: to give the north to the Germans and the south to the Scandanavians. Earlier the Black Hills tried to become a state, and would have been accepted if they would gave taken the Missouri River as their border (effectively meaking an East Dakota and West Dakota), but they assumed the Gold Boom would last forever: the Hills refused to acept the ranchers of the Great Planes as fellow statesmen, so they gambled for more. And lost.
Posted by: Dan tdaxp | Thursday, December 08, 2005