tdaxp

Dan
Your first charts shows what is known in physics as a compacitor. The threshold is called a gap (it is the same gap that Dr. Barnett recognizes). Inside the gap is stored an electrical field. The dendrites and axons correspond to positive and negative charges, but because physics is switched around, dendrites are actually negative charges and axons are positive charges. It does not really matter except to show direction and composition of a negative charge. As you say, what flows between the gap is energy. The unique thing is that the energy is called potential energy because it contains no mass but can be very powerful. I think this compares nicely with your model, because the first thing to flow between the dendrite and axon are ideas, which also contain no mass but can also be very powerful.

Posted by: Larry Dunbar | Saturday, May 21, 2005

Larry,

Great analogy. Energy that is sent to a neuron but not passed on is potential -- right now it does nothing, but add a little more and suddenly all the potential signals are converted into actual signals.

Sometimes I think of the threshhold as the "activation energy" of an electron jumping up to a higher orbit. Energy is added, added, added, nothing seems to happen, then POP, new output.

The real power of neural nets is when you tie thousands of neurons together. When neurons continually evolve so that the threshhold varies, and even the connections between the neurons changes, you having a thinking machine in a very literal definition.

An ideological movement is the same way. People are indifferent, indifferent, and then POP -- suddenly they are sympathizers. Then, POP, they jump up to the fellow traveler orbit.

Posted by: Dan | Sunday, May 22, 2005

Electrons

Dan

I am glad to see you have the basic principles of an electron down. The very existence of an electron is behind the reason I think some of the ideas of Dr. Barnett’s are so wacky.
An electron exists where it is because the frequencies involved are non-destructive. When an atom has 6 electrons in an orbit they exist because the frequency of each don’t cancel each other out. When energy is increased or decreased, negative or positive acceleration, the frequency changes so the electrons have to “move” out or “move” in, for them to exist.

Because I feel society act like an electron, particle wave, or lightwave, I also feel they can’t exists when their frequency are destructive to each other. If you replace implicit laws, which make a society exist, with frequency then you are able to understand what I mean.

I feel the frequency of our society produce a destructive frequency with China. China and North Korea produce a non-destructive frequency so without any modification to their frequency, they can exist. I simply don’t feel Dr. Barnett has factored frequency into his equation.

Without a changing B field and a changing E field an electron cannot exist. That is the very definition of frequency. It is something changing but at a constant rate. Frequency exists because of constant velocity. Because of Newton’s first law the velocity is constant unless acceleration is added. Because the velocity is constant and the object that is moving is an electron it produces a changing B field and E field at a certain frequency. A change in distance over a change in time produces acceleration. Velocity is a change in distance over a certain amount of time. Acceleration multiplied by mass produces force. Force over a distance is energy. The amount of energy used during a certain amount of time (say a lifetime) is power. Power is life. I just don’t like power wasted. In fact I demand it.

Posted by: Larry Dunbar | Sunday, May 22, 2005

Very interesting. I think that it is possab le to be an extreeemely dense mass acting as a compacitor.

Personal experience in my highschool years ago. The Chemestery lab had a unit to demonstrate visable static electricity.

Initial electirc charge from an 110 outlet. Aproximate 14inch sphere on a cilinder like a city water tank. Also a rod with a 2 and a half inch sphere on top and separated with a rubber ring. Mounted on a plateform with rubber legs.

The teacher placed about 24 glass quart jars on the floor and then wood planks on top. Preceeding to ask a volunteer I was interested and the only one.

Dense muscle is heredity in my family, I am a sinker in bodys of water.

So this machine showed an output of blue electricity jumping from the 2 1/2 " sphere to the 14" sphere. I placed my hand on the larger sphere and all of my body hairs stood out for all my classmates to see.

Yeah ok but then the ark of electricity became really strong and I could not move my hand off the sphere.

The electricity drew the small sphere on the rod from about, I think six inches away to nearly a one inch space.

Input fact that small sphere was flexable enough to rotate in a spiral that would be Tanjent with the equator of the 14" sphere.

My body gathered so much electricity that the outlet melted out of the metal box it was pluged into, the breaker triped, one third of the lights in the chem lab went out, and the fire alarm went off followed by the sprinklers.

This happened to me in 10th/ 11th grade.

I constantly feel flows of electricity as they engulf my caranium and the rest of my body sometimes in breif twitches that are strong enough to turn my head from 3 to 15 seconds. This is daily and I cannot recall when they started.

So My question finally is: What posability , on all theories avaliable, is there that my body then and now is dense enough to act as a compacitor? If so what should I do? nothing?




Micah

Posted by: Micah | Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Dan, you are correct, as your email indicated, I loved the challenge, not to mention hating the suffering going on. I eventually had to go back and reread my physic’s class notes (written by my instructor) to figure out the final piece of the puzzle, but I think I finally understand what happened and how the experiment that Micah went through went wrong.
Basically a giant EMP (electrical magnetic pulse, created when the charge surrounding the globe enabled the current in the wall socket to discharge or pulse) shorted out all (or some) positive charges in the body. If these positive charges are located along the spine (as I read somewhere they are) and these positive charged cells are used by the body to dump unwanted currants (just guessing), maybe that explains Micah’s feelings of electricity cruising through the body and sporadic discharges in surrounding muscle tissues. It sounds like a long shot, but I can try to post my complete theory on the subject, if I am successful in explaining my idea, in writing, on what happened.

Posted by: Larry Dunbar | Saturday, December 24, 2005

Hi Micah,
Another way of looking at what happened to your body during the experiment is by giving the objects in the room density. This density is figured as electrons per cubic inches of volume. The human body is full of electrons. While the electrons per cubic inches of volume may be different, but because the body more or less has constant shape, the sums of the electrical forces are zero. I believe we can assign an average density as a matter of this demonstration. The machine causes another density of electrons to form on the outside of the globe. When you placed your hand on it, this density transferred evenly around the outside of your body. This density was only allowed to reach a certain density before the excess crossed the gap between the small globe and the large. I believe this density was then allowed to follow the cord to the wall-socket and created a path for the third density to cross the gap in the junction box and flow out into the room towards, and possibly through, your body. This can be thought as an area of high pressure moving towards an area of low pressure.
Another name for high density of electrons is high frequency electrons. Because the electrons are closer together the wavelength are either shorter or they move back and forth from each other quicker. High frequency causes a capacitor (your body) to act like a short. The electrons have little resistance as they move through your body. All collisions between electrons are elastic; therefore I believe electrons in areas of your body were allowed to move to a higher state of activity (quantum leap).
I am still not sure what kind of damage if any could come from these conditions. I still believe you suffered an EMP. The amount of damage you would suffer depends greatly on the geometry of the room and how long the pulse lasted. Or in other words, it would be important to find out how long it took for the currant in the wall socket to atomize the metal in the junction box.
While I am not sure my description of what happened is the normal way of looking at this situation, I hope it gives you some idea on what could have happened. If you did suffer from an EMP, I am sure someone would be interested in helping you, if you are looking for someone to take your case. I am not a physicist, doctor, or a person of the academia. If this posting starts a debate on how wrong I am, that too may help you to understand your condition. I wish you luck and a healthy future.
larry

Posted by: Larry Dunbar | Thursday, December 29, 2005

Micah,
I have one more scenario I would like to present. I have looked at what happened to you during the experiment as if your body was a capacitor. A capacitor is basically a gap. This gap really doesn’t have to contain anything. What makes a capacitor work is currant. There is a mnemonic device for the sequence of a capacitor. This device is ICE. The “I” stands for currant. The “C” stands for Capacitance or geometry (in this case distance). “E” represents Electric Motive Force or Voltage. Once currant is present at the gap, depending on the Capacitance, voltage soon follows. What the voltage does is give the currant acceleration. Because acceleration exists without velocity, acceleration builds up (acceleration times mass is force, mass in this case is expressed as currant) until there is enough force to propel the currant against the capacitance and across the gap. So if your body got between currant and a potential, depending on your capacitance (your unusual body density) currant could flow from one side of your body to the other. However there is another scenario we need to look at. There is a good possibility that an inductor was involved instead of a capacitor.
An inductor has a mnemonic device designated as ELI. “E” represents voltage. “L” represents inductance (like capacitance, inductance represent the geometric attributes of the objects involved). “I” again represents currant. Unlike a capacitor, an inductor can be thought of as a gap filled with currant at a constant density. Usually this is represented as a loop of wire. The wire in your house is filled with currant at a constant density. This currant becomes useful to you when a voltage is applied to this wire. The currant that first goes to the light bulb when a switch is thrown is already in the wire attached to the light bulb. The switch merely adds voltage to the wire to coax the currant forward. The significance of the loop in the wire is that it offers the magnetic potential, of the currant, resistance to change in the direction of the currant. To make an inductor work, all that is needed is voltage. This voltage was available at the wall socket that burned out during your experiment.
So where is the inductor? The inductor, or wire loop, can loosely be thought of as the constant density of the currant surrounding your body. This currant density was formed when you placed your hand on the globe. I think it would be like there was an endless amount of loops surrounding your body. Because the area of the wire loops and the number of loops is so important in determining the magnetic field of an inductor, I am not sure how strong the “L” or inductance of the event. However because I believe a potential was carried over to the wall socket that represented the potential of your body, I believe a loop was formed. The currant in this loop changed directions when the currant from the wall socket shorted across the gap at the wall socket. This change in direction of the currant in the loop that formed around you could greatly affect the normal currant inside your body. How it affected the currant is beyond my understanding, but I have read a pdf file from someone who might know.
Her name is Denise Ingebo. While her work is with emotions and the human body, if a person is able to understand how the potential and kinetic energy of emotions move through the body then there should be some understanding on how currant or magnetic flux affects the body. While short term this probably doesn’t’ help you much, after reading the first 25 pages of her book, I would say the future looks hopeful. As the environment surrounding humans become more closely connected with increasing changes in currant and voltages, the need to understand how these changes affect the human body should increase. Basically, the radiation coming from that earplug jammed into your head from your Ipod is coming in closer contact with the currant moving through the human body. Because the intensity of that radiation is on the square of the distance from these currants it becomes exponential important to understand these forces. I am just saying that the interest in the problems you are having should become more and more interesting to science and industry. This could be very important to you.

Posted by: Larry Dunbar | Saturday, December 31, 2005